Does the proof match the scale of the claim?
In debate or philosophy, the person making a claim is responsible for proving it.
Burden of truth (more commonly known as the ) is the legal and philosophical obligation to provide enough evidence to support a claim. ⚖️ Legal Context Burden of Truth
It is nearly impossible to prove a non-existence (e.g., "unicorns don't exist").
To help you apply this, are you looking at this from a , philosophical , or personal perspective? Does the proof match the scale of the claim
A fallacy where someone demands their opponent disprove a claim instead of proving it themselves. 🛠️ How to Handle It
If you find yourself in a situation where the burden of truth matters: Who made the initial statement? ⚖️ Legal Context It is nearly impossible to
Don't feel forced to "disprove" a claim that hasn't been proven yet. Check the Standard: