Isaac Was Abraham's Only Child; Ishmael Was Not His Biological Child, According To Apostle Suleman - Legitvibes -

youtube.com/watch?v=PvD41obVdwI">Spirit of Ishmael and its impact on the church?

: Ishmael was born when Abraham (then Abram) was 86; Isaac was born 14 years later when he was 100.

While Suleman’s teaching focuses on the name change and spiritual status, the Bible traditionally records both as sons of the same man: youtube

: While Genesis 22:2 uses "only son," other scriptures like Genesis 25:9 state that "his sons Isaac and Ishmael buried him," acknowledging both as his children.

: In mainstream theology, the distinction is usually made between legitimacy in the covenant rather than biological paternity. : In mainstream theology, the distinction is usually

: Suleman points to Genesis 22:2 , where God tells Abraham, "Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac". He argues that if Ishmael were recognized as Abraham’s son by God, this phrasing would be inaccurate.

According to a teaching by , Ishmael is not considered the biological son of " Abraham ," but rather the son of Abram . Suleman posits that Isaac is Abraham's only son because God only addressed him as "Abraham" after the covenant change, which occurred before Isaac's birth. Key Arguments from Apostle Suleman's Teaching According to a teaching by , Ishmael is

: The teaching aligns with the broader theological view that Ishmael was a "son of the flesh" (born of human effort through Hagar), while Isaac was the "son of the promise" (born through divine intervention). Broader Biblical Context